comparison xml/dnsbl.in @ 57:419e00901570

changes to handle 5iantlavalamp.com
author carl
date Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:48:52 -0700
parents 57607387263d
children 510a511ad554
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
56:57607387263d 57:419e00901570
1 <html> 1 <html>
2 2
3 <head> 3 <head>
4 <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"> 4 <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
5 <title>DNSBL Sendmail milter - Version 3.6</title> 5 <title>DNSBL Sendmail milter - Version 3.7</title>
6 </head> 6 </head>
7 7
8 <center>Introduction</center> 8 <center>Introduction</center>
9 <p>This milter is released under the GPL license version 2 included in 9 <p>This milter is released under the GPL license version 2 included in
10 the LICENSE file in the distribution, and also available at 10 the LICENSE file in the distribution, and also available at
112 suffix). 112 suffix).
113 113
114 <li>If the mail has not been accepted or rejected yet, the body content 114 <li>If the mail has not been accepted or rejected yet, the body content
115 is optionally scanned for HTTP URLs (after base64, mime and html entity 115 is optionally scanned for HTTP URLs (after base64, mime and html entity
116 decoding), and the first &lt;configurable&gt; host names are checked for 116 decoding), and the first &lt;configurable&gt; host names are checked for
117 their presence on the SBL. If any host name is on the SBL, the mail is 117 their presence on the SBL. If any host name is on the SBL, and it is
118 rejected. If we are doing body content scanning, we also scan for 118 not on the "ignore" list, the mail is rejected. If we are doing body
119 excessive bad html tags, and if a &lt;configurable&gt; limit is 119 content scanning, we also scan for excessive bad html tags, and if a
120 exceeded, the mail is rejected. 120 &lt;configurable&gt; limit is exceeded, the mail is rejected.
121 121
122 </ol> 122 </ol>
123 123
124 <hr> 124 <hr>
125 <center>Sendmail access vs. DNSBL</center> 125 <center>Sendmail access vs. DNSBL</center>